Identity Verified, Counterparty Unproven: A Diligence Guide to Companies House Checks
Photo: Richter Frank-Jurgen, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Companies House identity verification is now a familiar step in UK incorporations and filings. For directors, people with significant control and LLP members, the requirement is part of the baseline of corporate administration. For firms onboarding counterparties, however, the practical question is different: what does a verified badge actually prove? The short answer is identity, not creditworthiness, authority or commercial probity.
What the regime confirms
The verification process, introduced under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 and phased in since, confirms that an individual is who they claim to be. Verification is typically completed through GOV.UK One Login or an authorised corporate service provider. Once verified, the individual's status is recorded against their Companies House record and linked to filings. The regime also introduced registered email addresses and tightened the use of corporate service providers. It is a meaningful control against impersonation and the misuse of shell companies.
What it does not confirm
Verification does not test:
- authority to bind the company;
- the truth of beneficial ownership information beyond the PSC statement;
- solvency or financial standing;
- disqualification, sanctions, PEP status or adverse media;
- the integrity of the ownership chain, particularly where offshore trusts or nominees are involved;
- commercial probity, litigation history or past insolvencies;
- the accuracy of filed accounts.
In other words, verification confirms identity. It does not confirm that the person is good for the deal.
Why transactional teams should not treat it as a condition precedent
In M&A, lending and supplier onboarding, verification can reduce the risk of fraud by impersonation. It does not answer the questions that determine whether a transaction should proceed: can this entity pay, can this director sign, and is the ownership structure what it appears to be? A verified director of an insolvent company is still a verified director. A verified shareholder in a complex offshore chain tells you little about control.
A short checklist for commercial and legal teams
- Entity verification: confirm company number, registered office, status and filing history. Check the insolvency and charges registers.
- Authority: obtain the board resolution, signatory matrix, articles and any shareholder agreement. Confirm delegated authority.
- Beneficial ownership: go beyond the PSC register. Request a structure chart and consider trust deeds or nominee arrangements.
- Integrity screening: check sanctions, PEP, adverse media, director disqualification and debarment lists.
- Financial diligence: review accounts, credit references, parent company support and any security.
- Contractual protections: include authority and solvency warranties, execution formalities, parent guarantees and termination rights.
- Ongoing monitoring: set filing alerts, re-screen periodically and check confirmation statements.
- Record and escalate: document the verification step and the residual gaps; escalate red flags to the appropriate committee.
Drafting implications
Contractual warranties should not assume that verification has done the work. A typical authority warranty, no-conflict warranty and solvency warranty remain necessary. Conditions precedent should include delivery of board resolutions and, where relevant, legal opinions. For high-value engagements, consider a parent guarantee or escrow. Anti-bribery and sanctions clauses should be supported by screening, not just paper.
The verification dividend
The regime raises the floor. It makes impersonation harder and improves the quality of the register. But a floor is not a ceiling. Firms that treat identity verification as the end of diligence will miss the risks that matter commercially. Firms that treat it as the beginning will use it to ask better questions.